A Question for the Offended: Remedy for a Crisis — Clinton, Trump or ?

Originally posted JULY 19, 2016

obamao

Four grueling years ago,  the Wall Street-funded  2-Party duopoly imposed a horrible choice upon the American people:

The moderate Mitt ROMNEY,  Vulture Capitalist,  vs.  Barry Soetoro-Obama,  the flashy subversive Socialist, a closet Muslim (and who knows what else).

Although Texas Congressman Ron Paul energized the Republican Liberty movement by packing hundreds of arenas with millions of young, enthusiastic supporters, the US Corporate Media assisted the neo-Conservative  cabal of Bush-Rove-Romney in splitting the vote from one primary to the next, covering up the subterfuge, and squandering this vital new wave of potential  life-long Republican advocates and reformers.

 

paul-campaign

Who can forget the betrayal of the Bush-Rove-RNC’s  engineering of the nomination of Mitt Romney through dirty deals from Iowa all the way to Tampa?

Who can forget Romney throwing the fight by losing 2 of 3 debates?   Did Mitt take a dive for Barak Hussein Obama, and the espionage operation known as the Clinton Global Initiative?  Did the Bush-banker crime cartel place him there to ensure the New World Order, declared by George H.W. Bush on  9/ 11/ 1990, would prevail ?

 

ron-paul-on-rigged-system-compressed

BUT THIS Year a champion arose to take on the US Corporate Media complex and bust down their electronic Berlin Wall of distraction, diversion, and political correctness.

The American people rallied to the sound of a Trump.  We watched  a street brawler  emerge from the GOP pack as the standard bearer for a return to the America First battle cry of the Reagan years.

trump-and-tpp

Donald Trump and select spokesmen exposed the globalist connections of the CFR-dominated /Goldman-Sachs banker cartel behind the other leading contenders (namely, Boy Marco Rubio, Canadian Ted Cruz, & the floundering Jeb Bush).

Continue reading >>>

randybarnettpushcardside1-001About the Author: Randy was born and raised in Bartlesville, Oklahoma. He is a graduate from OSU with double major in Economics and Political Science. He served his country with United States Marine Corps where served as a pilot & Intel Officer. After the military Randy earned a Master of Arts degree in Public Policy at Regent University. He is currently the tri-county coordinator for Oath keepers, a member of Gunowners of America, and OK2A.

Advertisement

Reblog — The 2012 Elections: A Death Knell for the Christian Right by Kevin Swanson

The 2012 Elections:
A Death Knell for the Christian Right

By Kevin Swanson

Well, the dust has cleared on the Obama agenda. After four years of Barack Obama’s presidency, we have socialist medicine through mandated insurance, more government-funded abortions, and about $4 trillion of extra debt. Knowing this, I’m apparently supposed to vote for the Other Guy. Never mind the fact that George W. Bush left office with a 1.5 trillion dollar budget deficit (inflation adjusted), and it was his appointee to the Supreme Court who gave the final push to Obama’s socialist medicine plan.

I am told to set all this aside in this election and to endorse the Other Guy for President — the latest elephant in the room. He must be better — but why? I am offered reasons for supporting the Other Guy, and here they are:

(1). The Other Guy is a Mormon, and everybody knows that Mormons are better than Muslims. Clearly, not all Muslims or Mormons are polygamists. Then again, it is possible that President Obama has cooled on his “Muslim faith.” Or maybe the Other Guy has lapsed with his “Mormon faith.” If Mormons or Muslims led the nation for a hundred years, where would we be? I wonder. Suffice it to say, I’m not convinced that Mormons are better than Muslims.

(2). Everybody knows that Republican presidents are more conservative fiscally than Democrat presidents. This may be true in the minds of Republicans who enjoy listening to Republican rhetoric. I know. I know. Most conservatives do not want to be confused with the data. But here it is.

Annualized Growth in Spending:

  • Reagan — first term — 8.7%
  • Reagan — second term — 4.9%
  • Bush I — 5.4%
  • Clinton — first term — 3.2%
  • Clinton — second term — 3.9%
  • Bush 2 — first term — 7.3%
  • Bush 2 — second term — 8.1%
  • Obama — 1.4%[1]

1. Source: http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/05/24/who-is-the-smallest-government-spender-since-eisenhower-would-you-believe-its-barack-obama/

Read more here >>>

[Editor’s note:  What is missing from this data is the future cost of legislation such as Obamacare and entitlement spending./sc]

Posted by Sandra Crosnoe for Finding Gems & Sharing Them

OKGrassroots

%d bloggers like this: