Congratulations Oklahoma Winners — Actions will Validate Campaign Promises — Oklahoma General Election Results 2012

Oklahoma Election Results 2012 Summary version:

Romney wins Oklahoma but Obama is reelected President of the United States in a very close election.

Bridenstine wins Oklahoma CD01 Congressional Seat replacing Sullivan (who he beat in the primary election).

Oklahoma passes all six state questions and retains all judges listed on the ballot.

Here are the more detailed Oklahoma election results:

http://www.ok.gov/elections/support/ok_results_seb.html (for latest results)

Results as of: 11/7/2012 5:42:44 AM
Line
PRESIDENT
FOR PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
BARACK OBAMA (DEM) 19,328 43,121 380,338 442,787 33.2%
MITT ROMNEY (REP) 44,617 68,596 776,497 889,710 66.8%
Total 63,945 111,717 1,156,835 1,332,497
Line
UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE
FOR UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 01
327 of 327 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
JOHN OLSON (DEM) 4,118 6,287 80,905 91,310 32.0%
JIM BRIDENSTINE (REP) 8,980 7,541 164,365 180,886 63.5%
CRAIG ALLEN (IND) 510 451 11,825 12,786 4.5%
Total 13,608 14,279 257,095 284,982
FOR UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 02
530 of 530 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
ROB WALLACE (DEM) 2,995 10,983 81,953 95,931 38.3%
MARKWAYNE MULLIN (REP) 5,672 16,836 121,009 143,517 57.3%
MICHAEL G. FULKS (IND) 400 1,045 9,364 10,809 4.3%
Total 9,067 28,864 212,326 250,257
FOR UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 03
481 of 481 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
TIMOTHY RAY MURRAY (DEM) 2,308 6,251 44,736 53,295 20.0%
FRANK D. LUCAS (REP) 8,921 21,954 170,088 200,963 75.3%
WILLIAM M. SANDERS (IND) 524 1,135 11,087 12,746 4.8%
Total 11,753 29,340 225,911 267,004
FOR UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 04
350 of 350 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
DONNA MARIE BEBO (DEM) 3,370 7,814 60,571 71,755 27.6%
TOM COLE (REP) 8,728 13,999 153,834 176,561 67.9%
RJ HARRIS (IND) 531 732 10,462 11,725 4.5%
Total 12,629 22,545 224,867 260,041
FOR UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 05
273 of 273 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
TOM GUILD (DEM) 4,598 9,577 83,184 97,359 37.3%
JAMES LANKFORD (REP) 10,737 6,117 136,567 153,421 58.7%
PAT MARTIN (IND) 195 213 4,972 5,380 2.1%
ROBERT T. MURPHY (IND) 223 182 4,757 5,162 2.0%
Total 15,753 16,089 229,480 261,322
Line
STATE SENATOR
FOR STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 3
47 of 47 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
JIM BYNUM (DEM) 593 932 9,737 11,262 45.7%
WAYNE SHAW (REP) 697 1,131 11,555 13,383 54.3%
Total 1,290 2,063 21,292 24,645
FOR STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 5
85 of 85 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
JERRY ELLIS (DEM) 389 1,418 14,111 15,918 66.5%
HOWARD HOUCHEN (REP) 330 953 6,724 8,007 33.5%
Total 719 2,371 20,835 23,925
FOR STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 7
76 of 76 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
J. PAUL LANE (DEM) 442 1,208 10,490 12,140 46.2%
LARRY BOGGS (REP) 559 1,353 12,248 14,160 53.8%
Total 1,001 2,561 22,738 26,300
FOR STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 9
32 of 32 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
EARL GARRISON (DEM) 486 3,172 13,518 17,176 69.7%
BARNEY S TAYLOR (REP) 301 1,313 5,855 7,469 30.3%
Total 787 4,485 19,373 24,645
FOR STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 11
36 of 36 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
JABAR SHUMATE (DEM) 740 1,881 12,573 15,194 76.0%
DAVE BELL (REP) 183 168 3,056 3,407 17.0%
CURTIS J. MULLINS (IND) 39 78 1,284 1,401 7.0%
Total 962 2,127 16,913 20,002
FOR STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 13
51 of 51 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
SUSAN PADDACK (DEM) 600 2,419 16,789 19,808 75.9%
FRED E SMITH (REP) 288 755 5,263 6,306 24.1%
Total 888 3,174 22,052 26,114
FOR STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 15
31 of 31 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
CLAUDIA GRIFFITH (DEM) 623 1,149 9,950 11,722 38.4%
ROB STANDRIDGE (REP) 1,128 1,135 16,503 18,766 61.6%
Total 1,751 2,284 26,453 30,488
FOR STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 27
77 of 77 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
A. BRYCE MARLATT (REP) 1,126 3,254 18,808 23,188 84.5%
TOMMY W. NICHOLSON (IND) 201 589 3,470 4,260 15.5%
Total 1,327 3,843 22,278 27,448
FOR STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 31
53 of 53 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
TONY TERRILL (DEM) 274 1,073 6,156 7,503 32.2%
DON BARRINGTON (REP) 607 1,842 13,348 15,797 67.8%
Total 881 2,915 19,504 23,300
FOR STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 39
39 of 39 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
JULIE HALL (DEM) 787 628 12,960 14,375 43.1%
BRIAN A. CRAIN (REP) 1,166 599 17,228 18,993 56.9%
Total 1,953 1,227 30,188 33,368
FOR STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 41
29 of 29 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
CLARK JOLLEY (REP) 2,295 1,026 24,059 27,380 79.4%
RICHARD PRAWDZIENSKI (IND) 437 404 6,262 7,103 20.6%
Total 2,732 1,430 30,321 34,483
FOR STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 43
54 of 54 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
MIKE FULLERTON (DEM) 311 682 7,721 8,714 29.3%
COREY BROOKS (REP) 942 1,683 18,384 21,009 70.7%
Total 1,253 2,365 26,105 29,723
Line
STATE REPRESENTATIVE
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 2
21 of 21 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
RICK AGENT (DEM) 178 650 4,608 5,436 46.3%
JOHN R. BENNETT (REP) 217 790 5,307 6,314 53.7%
Total 395 1,440 9,915 11,750
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 3
21 of 21 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
JAMES H LOCKHART (DEM) 210 756 6,045 7,011 59.8%
ROGER MATTOX (REP) 161 673 3,883 4,717 40.2%
Total 371 1,429 9,928 11,728
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 12
18 of 18 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
WADE ROUSSELOT (DEM) 203 799 6,323 7,325 53.9%
DAVID TACKETT (REP) 268 564 5,424 6,256 46.1%
Total 471 1,363 11,747 13,581
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 14
15 of 15 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
JERRY RAINS (DEM) 183 789 4,690 5,662 45.1%
ARTHUR HULBERT (REP) 271 993 5,616 6,880 54.9%
Total 454 1,782 10,306 12,542
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 16
29 of 29 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
JERRY SHOEMAKE (DEM) 187 687 6,656 7,530 61.0%
JAMES DELSO (REP) 202 339 4,277 4,818 39.0%
Total 389 1,026 10,933 12,348
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 20
22 of 22 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
MATT BRANSTETTER (DEM) 176 278 3,815 4,269 33.5%
BOBBY CLEVELAND (REP) 452 538 7,471 8,461 66.5%
Total 628 816 11,286 12,730
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 21
17 of 17 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
JERRY L. TOMLINSON (DEM) 98 453 3,564 4,115 36.0%
DUSTIN ROBERTS (REP) 190 885 6,232 7,307 64.0%
Total 288 1,338 9,796 11,422
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 22
32 of 32 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
DORIS ANNE ROW (DEM) 198 900 5,391 6,489 49.1%
CHARLES A McCALL (REP) 230 1,031 5,460 6,721 50.9%
Total 428 1,931 10,851 13,210
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 23
14 of 14 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
SHAWNA KELLER (DEM) 123 197 4,080 4,400 41.5%
TERRY O’DONNELL (REP) 227 239 5,730 6,196 58.5%
Total 350 436 9,810 10,596
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 26
13 of 13 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
PATTY SUE WAGSTAFF (DEM) 210 693 3,944 4,847 39.4%
JUSTIN FREELAND WOOD (REP) 284 1,027 6,144 7,455 60.6%
Total 494 1,720 10,088 12,302
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 27
17 of 17 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
RANDY R GILBERT (DEM) 172 320 4,466 4,958 38.1%
JOSH COCKROFT (REP) 400 544 7,117 8,061 61.9%
Total 572 864 11,583 13,019
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 28
17 of 17 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
MARILYN RAINWATER (DEM) 107 381 3,711 4,199 37.2%
TOM NEWELL (REP) 280 535 6,275 7,090 62.8%
Total 387 916 9,986 11,289
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 29
21 of 21 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
DAVID W NARCOMEY (DEM) 101 294 2,826 3,221 23.6%
SKYE McNIEL (REP) 298 860 9,242 10,400 76.4%
Total 399 1,154 12,068 13,621
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 32
23 of 23 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
KEITH KINNAMON (DEM) 183 556 5,115 5,854 42.8%
JASON SMALLEY (REP) 277 693 6,844 7,814 57.2%
Total 460 1,249 11,959 13,668
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 36
20 of 20 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
JIM MASSEY (DEM) 217 160 4,425 4,802 34.6%
SEAN ROBERTS (REP) 435 240 8,399 9,074 65.4%
Total 652 400 12,824 13,876
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 37
23 of 23 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
NANCY L. NIEMANN (DEM) 211 356 4,756 5,323 40.9%
STEVEN E. VAUGHAN (REP) 417 605 6,685 7,707 59.1%
Total 628 961 11,441 13,030
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 42
24 of 24 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
STEVEN VINES (DEM) 123 282 2,308 2,713 20.2%
LISA J. BILLY (REP) 417 1,140 9,146 10,703 79.8%
Total 540 1,422 11,454 13,416
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 45
11 of 11 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
PAULA ROBERTS (DEM) 348 755 5,665 6,768 49.9%
AARON STILES (REP) 389 553 5,844 6,786 50.1%
Total 737 1,308 11,509 13,554
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 47
14 of 14 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
LEON A PIVINSKI (DEM) 178 252 2,725 3,155 20.4%
LESLIE KATHRYN OSBORN (REP) 808 898 10,604 12,310 79.6%
Total 986 1,150 13,329 15,465
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 48
20 of 20 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
BRIAN SPENCER (DEM) 153 413 3,059 3,625 28.0%
PATRICK OWNBEY (REP) 368 1,033 7,904 9,305 72.0%
Total 521 1,446 10,963 12,930
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 51
23 of 23 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
STEWART MEYER (DEM) 174 382 4,559 5,115 35.7%
SCOTT R. BIGGS (REP) 436 670 8,119 9,225 64.3%
Total 610 1,052 12,678 14,340
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 56
29 of 29 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
DAVID L PERRYMAN (DEM) 211 766 5,110 6,087 50.5%
CHUCK UTSLER (REP) 243 656 5,059 5,958 49.5%
Total 454 1,422 10,169 12,045
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 60
19 of 19 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
KENDRA MENZ-KIMBLE (DEM) 168 450 4,095 4,713 37.7%
DAN FISHER (REP) 345 677 6,763 7,785 62.3%
Total 513 1,127 10,858 12,498
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 66
17 of 17 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
DAVID C. PHILLIPS, III (DEM) 186 222 3,975 4,383 33.2%
JADINE NOLLAN (REP) 331 259 8,246 8,836 66.8%
Total 517 481 12,221 13,219
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 71
16 of 16 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
DAN ARTHRELL (DEM) 367 409 5,685 6,461 46.8%
KATIE HENKE (REP) 492 302 6,563 7,357 53.2%
Total 859 711 12,248 13,818
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 72
19 of 19 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
SENECA SCOTT (DEM) 181 455 5,350 5,986 72.7%
RANDALL L. REESE (REP) 78 80 2,087 2,245 27.3%
Total 259 535 7,437 8,231
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 76
13 of 13 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
GLENDA K. PUETT (DEM) 177 218 4,700 5,095 32.3%
DAVID BRUMBAUGH (REP) 551 235 9,880 10,666 67.7%
Total 728 453 14,580 15,761
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 78
21 of 21 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
JEANNIE McDANIEL (DEM) 422 394 7,988 8,804 61.4%
PAUL CATALANO (REP) 226 167 5,134 5,527 38.6%
Total 648 561 13,122 14,331
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 83
18 of 18 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
ED HOLZBERGER (DEM) 360 661 4,876 5,897 34.9%
RANDY McDANIEL (REP) 1,085 409 9,491 10,985 65.1%
Total 1,445 1,070 14,367 16,882
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 86
25 of 25 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
WILL FOURKILLER (DEM) 440 566 6,322 7,328 68.7%
RUSSELL DON TURNER (REP) 180 268 2,890 3,338 31.3%
Total 620 834 9,212 10,666
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 87
13 of 13 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
NICK SINGER (DEM) 243 357 5,082 5,682 44.6%
JASON NELSON (REP) 461 174 6,413 7,048 55.4%
Total 704 531 11,495 12,730
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 88
13 of 13 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
KAY FLOYD (DEM) 266 419 6,774 7,459 69.2%
AARON KASPEREIT (REP) 181 112 3,032 3,325 30.8%
Total 447 531 9,806 10,784
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 99
16 of 16 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
ANASTASIA A. PITTMAN (DEM) 408 1,841 8,379 10,628 83.5%
WILLARD LINZY (REP) 123 157 1,819 2,099 16.5%
Total 531 1,998 10,198 12,727
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 101
19 of 19 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
STEPHEN E COVERT (DEM) 242 287 4,586 5,115 32.4%
GARY BANZ (REP) 575 181 9,908 10,664 67.6%
Total 817 468 14,494 15,779
Line
JUDICIAL RETENTION
SUPREME COURT – NOMA D. GURICH
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
YES 33,377 65,638 689,311 788,326 66.5%
NO 17,255 33,167 347,457 397,879 33.5%
Total 50,632 98,805 1,036,768 1,186,205
SUPREME COURT – YVONNE KAUGER
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
YES 32,610 64,499 676,471 773,580 65.6%
NO 17,880 33,639 353,262 404,781 34.4%
Total 50,490 98,138 1,029,733 1,178,361
SUPREME COURT – JAMES E. EDMONDSON
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
YES 33,166 65,843 691,763 790,772 66.9%
NO 17,485 32,677 341,080 391,242 33.1%
Total 50,651 98,520 1,032,843 1,182,014
SUPREME COURT – DOUGLAS L. COMBS
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
YES 32,770 65,101 684,656 782,527 66.4%
NO 17,424 33,149 345,280 395,853 33.6%
Total 50,194 98,250 1,029,936 1,178,380
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS – CLANCY SMITH
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
YES 32,591 63,777 674,548 770,916 65.8%
NO 17,268 33,882 349,323 400,473 34.2%
Total 49,859 97,659 1,023,871 1,171,389
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS – ARLENE JOHNSON
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
YES 32,822 65,084 680,298 778,204 66.6%
NO 17,036 32,473 341,290 390,799 33.4%
Total 49,858 97,557 1,021,588 1,169,003
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS – DAVID B. LEWIS
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
YES 32,973 64,784 684,056 781,813 67.0%
NO 16,741 32,577 335,978 385,296 33.0%
Total 49,714 97,361 1,020,034 1,167,109
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS – P. THOMAS THORNBRUGH
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
YES 33,353 64,193 687,579 785,125 67.3%
NO 16,398 33,030 331,764 381,192 32.7%
Total 49,751 97,223 1,019,343 1,166,317
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS – WILLIAM C. HETHERINGTON, JR.
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
YES 32,377 63,358 666,257 761,992 65.6%
NO 17,186 33,485 348,188 398,859 34.4%
Total 49,563 96,843 1,014,445 1,160,851
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS – KENNETH L. BUETTNER
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
YES 33,067 63,719 683,415 780,201 67.3%
NO 16,424 32,978 330,189 379,591 32.7%
Total 49,491 96,697 1,013,604 1,159,792
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS – ROBERT BOBBY BELL
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
YES 32,328 63,249 669,133 764,710 65.9%
NO 17,193 33,479 344,648 395,320 34.1%
Total 49,521 96,728 1,013,781 1,160,030
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS – E. BAY MITCHELL, III
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
YES 32,904 63,906 679,451 776,261 66.9%
NO 16,607 32,903 334,726 384,236 33.1%
Total 49,511 96,809 1,014,177 1,160,497
Line
STATE QUESTIONS
STATE QUESTION NO. 758 LEGISLATIVE REFERENDUM NO. 358
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
FOR THE PROPOSAL – YES 42,807 68,814 745,090 856,711 67.7%
AGAINST THE PROPOSAL – NO 14,445 37,287 356,593 408,325 32.3%
Total 57,252 106,101 1,101,683 1,265,036
STATE QUESTION NO. 759 LEGISLATIVE REFERENDUM NO. 359
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
FOR THE PROPOSAL – YES 34,174 57,866 652,514 744,554 59.2%
AGAINST THE PROPOSAL – NO 22,885 47,656 442,705 513,246 40.8%
Total 57,059 105,522 1,095,219 1,257,800
STATE QUESTION NO. 762 LEGISLATIVE REFERENDUM NO. 360
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
FOR THE PROPOSAL – YES 33,876 62,376 647,613 743,865 59.2%
AGAINST THE PROPOSAL – NO 23,092 43,015 447,027 513,134 40.8%
Total 56,968 105,391 1,094,640 1,256,999
STATE QUESTION NO. 764 LEGISLATIVE REFERENDUM NO. 361
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
FOR THE PROPOSAL – YES 32,167 58,738 614,131 705,036 56.7%
AGAINST THE PROPOSAL – NO 24,006 45,555 469,047 538,608 43.3%
Total 56,173 104,293 1,083,178 1,243,644
STATE QUESTION NO. 765 LEGISLATIVE REFERENDUM NO. 362
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
FOR THE PROPOSAL – YES 34,595 58,889 657,074 750,558 59.9%
AGAINST THE PROPOSAL – NO 21,974 46,184 433,932 502,090 40.1%
Total 56,569 105,073 1,091,006 1,252,648
STATE QUESTION NO. 766 LEGISLATIVE REFERENDUM NO. 363
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
FOR THE PROPOSAL – YES 38,321 65,374 721,047 824,742 65.0%
AGAINST THE PROPOSAL – NO 18,923 41,058 384,656 444,637 35.0%
Total 57,244 106,432 1,105,703 1,269,379
Results as of: 11/7/2012 5:42:44 AM

Keep your promises made on the campaign trail and your oath of office too.

Keep a copy of the State and Federal Constitution handy for reference (before you vote)!

Follow peace with all men, and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord:
Hebrews 12:13-15

Posted by Sandra Crosnoe for Finding Gems & Sharing Them

OKGrassroots

Posted in Activism, Conservatives, Elections, Grassroots, History, OKGrassroots, Politics, R3publicans, Teaparty. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Leave a Comment »

Rand Paul: Romney’s wrong on Middle East, defense spending

Rand Paul: Romney’s wrong on Middle East, defense spending

CNN
October 10, 2012

This week, I will campaign for Gov. Mitt Romney. I believe this election will and should be about moving America back from the edge of the abyss on which we stand, where our debt and spending threaten to overwhelm and drown us. Romney’s belief in free markets, limited government and trade make him the clear choice to lead our country come January.

I do not, however, support a call for intervention in Syria. And, if such intervention were being contemplated, it is absolutely necessary that Congress give any such authority to the president. No president, Republican or Democrat, has the unilateral power to take our nation to war without the authority of the legislature.

At times, I have been encouraged by Romney’s foreign policy. I agree with his call to end the war in Afghanistan sooner rather than later and with his skepticism of, and call for reform in, foreign aid, but I am a bit dismayed by his foreign policy speech Monday, titled “Mantle of Leadership.”

Related News:

Mitt Romney’s Foreign Policy Speech Promises Bigger Government and New Wars
http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/pol…t-and-new-wars

Mitt Romney’s Foreign Policy Shows Strong CFR, Neo-con Influence
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews…4-romney-forei

 

Posted by Sandra Crosnoe for Finding Gems & Sharing Them

OKGrassroot

My reply to RNC Fundraiser Request — First Fire Ben Ginsberg

Some ideas for ways to raise $$$ from real Republicans
(or my reply to RNC fundraiser request)
1) fire Ben Ginsberg
2) announce Ron Paul as a frontrunner for Secretary of Treasury
3) then resend this request

TAMPA, Fla. — Top Republicans are fighting one another over what one party leader called “one of the biggest power grabs” in the party’s history.
Senior GOP officials are accusing the Romney campaign’s chief attorney, Ben Ginsberg, of pushing through a rules change for delegate selection that would give Mitt Romney enormous power over the primary process should he win the White House and seek re-election in 2016.
“It shifts the power to select delegates from the state party to the [party’s presidential] candidate,” Republican National Committee Vice Chairman Jim Bopp told The Washington Times on Sunday. “And it would make the Republican Party a top-down, not bottom-up, party.”

Read more: GOP officials accuse Romney of ‘power grab’ – Washington Times

Reblog: Grassroots just got a massive dose of RNC fertilizer

Reblogged from Republican Coalition of Denton County:

SHOVEL-READY?

Grassroots GOP leaders across Denton County and the state of Texas have begun a grassroots uprising, after the Republican National Committee began pushing through a set of hugely unpopular Rule changes at the Republican National Convention in Tampa last week. The rules attempt to take away the power of the grassroots to conduct business at the local, state, and national levels.

Read more… 241 more words

 

Media Darlings or Plastic Men — see new Revolution Super PAC TV Ad

Ron Paul for President 2012

vs the Media Darlings (or plastic men)

Want this ad to air in major primary states?

Make it possible with a contribution at http://RevolutionPAC.com/donate

SuperPACs have NO contribution limits. Individuals, businesses, and organizations may donate any amount.

(must be US citizens, US-bases businesses & orgs)

Are you serious about taking back our party and our country from those who would sell us out and compromise liberty?    Then let’s get ready to rumble and take our country back and reduce the size of government a whole bunch!  
For Life and Liberty,
Sandra Crosnoe
Crossposted:  R3publicans 
 

Click on pic to donate to Revolution Super PAC

Media Manipulation Message of the Iowa Straw Poll? GretaWire Thread is Interesting, Green Map is Astounding and Comments are Revealing …

Results of the Iowa Straw Poll in case you haven’t actually seen them:

1. Congresswoman Michele Bachmann (4823, 28.55%)

2. Congressman Ron Paul (4671, 27.65%)

3. Governor Tim Pawlenty (2293, 13.57%)

4. Senator Rick Santorum (1657, 9.81%)

5. Herman Cain (1456, 8.62%)

6. Governor Rick Perry (718, 3.62%) write-in

7. Governor Mitt Romney (567, 3.36%)

8. Speaker Newt Gingrich (385, 2.28%)

9. Governor Jon Huntsman (69, 0.41%)

10. Congressman Thad McCotter (35, 0.21%)

as reported by LATimes here>>>

Then of course there was the Green Map online poll (Topix link) this weekend captured here:

And then there was the GretaWire Straw Poll:

Thanks to the help of Mannalis Barnes, we were able to sift through the plethora of comments there to find the little tidbits of truth about our favorite candidate, Ron Paul. You know the things the media could have reported about but failed to do so because they were so busy spinning the dialogue and projecting their own wishes until pretty boy Perry announces and convinces you to do the drugs he wants you to have that will put money in his crony capitalists friends pockets. Anyway, I digress. Here are some grassroots thoughts from the GretaWire comments or little gems we found among some of the rubbish there. You can go back through and see for yourself if you like because we definitely hand picked our favorites for you to share here:

marcar72
Ron Paul is for freedom and liberty . He is not for a one world government controlled by military aggression or throwing money at a nation . He is for the federal government being run by the states not the federal government running the states . States can run themselves . The federal government will run what the constitution says it can and the rest of it is controlled by the individual states . He is for sound money not Federal reserve notes passed out by a private bank that then having nothing invested buy debt and collects the interest .

Mitch Covington
Ron Paul is for a STRONG national DEFENSE. He will NOT destroy the military, just make it more sensible. We don’t need 700 bases in 130 countries around the world. We don’t need to be in the mid-east quagmires. We simply cannot afford them. We can still have the strongest military in the world and defend ourselves quite well under Ron Paul.

Bill Myers
Destroy our military? Oh, not so at all! Our military doesn’t seem to agree with you given the fact that Ron Paul gets more campaign donations from military personnel than any other candidate in both the 2008 and 2012 campaigns. In fact, Ron Paul wants to strengthen national defense by bringing our troops back to secure our borders and coastline. Ron Paul just wants to dismantle the highly inefficient and corrupt military-industrial complex that has been pillaging this country since President Eisenhower started warning us over 50 years ago.

As all Ron Paul supporters like me will tell some one like you – do your homework on Ron Paul. His ideas seem revolutionary because we’ve gone far too long subject to socialist and neocon ideas.

Non-interventionist
People who will go along with an interventionist and imperialistic foreign policy will go along with anything. Who do you think this benefits except the weapons manufacturers and large corporations who privatize the country’s oil, water, and other natural resources, as in Iraq. As Paul explained in the debate (and he easily won even based solely on audience response), Iran is surrounded by countries with nuclear weapons (such as Israel, who has over 200 illegal nukes) and Pakistan and India (who helped get them from guess who), and China and Russia. Who do you think is a bigger threat, countries that are ambivalent toward the United States and have nukes or Iran, who the CIA says isn’t even close to developing them? What does Israel have to fear with 200+ nukes?

It seems that those who espouse the virtue of common sense have trouble convincing some Americans of this seeming paradox (in their minds). It turns out that the troops value defending our own country higher than the interventionist goals of the military-industrial complex and the ruling class. Staying out of Middle-Eastern countries will actually help us become much safer in the long term. What damage is done to our reputation cannot be undone, but at least we can help restore a little respect in the eyes of other countries if we just get the hell out!

Actually, his ideas are more mainstream than the media or more traditionally-voting (left-right) Americans. The biggest mistake in voting is to think that your vote will be wasted. That is true only if enogh people are convinced not to vote for the right candidate. We don’t have time to wait for Bachman or Perry or Palin to “come around” and figure out how things work. We need someone who understand the system and how to fix it. We have no more time. The issues threatening to destroy this country are not two or three years or Presidential terms from catching up with us, they are here! We need to deal with them today and begin the process of cleaning up the mess created by the old ruling class. Let’s vote someone in that will jail the bankers and jail the politicians that got us into this mess! Someone who will get us out of undeclared wars, wars that are not wars at all but are exercises in expanding our empire. The establishment commits treason on a daily basis, and you all know what the punishment for treason is right?

If we spent half as much time and money on keeping track of the money going out of the Treasury as we did invading and occupying other countries, not only would we have money left in the Treasury but the rest of the world might actually have some respect left for us. As it stands, we are bankrupt and our children are bankrupt. Now…what are we going to do about it! Elect Palin, who’s never written a speech much less a book? Perry, who sells out to globalists every chance he gets? To Bachmann, who puts her friendship with Israel above our own national security? Don’t set your minds on someone because your friends or family vote a certain way or because that candidate says that you are being patriotic for voting for them. It’s no longer about Republican or Democrat. Vote from your conscience and not from who you see on TV more. Our votes will not be wasted voting for Ron Paul unless we allow the media and others to convince us of this. If 2008 was an important election, this is exponentially more so. Do your research and vote for someone who will help stop the country from going the way of Zimbabwe! Vote for Ron Paul!!

Sparkplug

If he had his way our military would be incredibly strong because it wouldn’t wasted on fighting several futile wars all over the globe. How anyone could say that our military is strong now after 10 years of being stretched to the limit is a mystery.

guest
Ron Paul does have a lot of supporters. Just because the mainstream media isnt pushing him down your throat like Perry, Bachmnn, and Romney……does not mean he does not have supporters. The people who support Ron Paul have an understanding of the constitution, ask questions, and do research instead of just listening to what is on tv. Ron Paul has been chosen by THE PEOPLE, not the media, not the banks, and not the corporations.

Andrew Lusty
Some of the more important quotes Ron Paul made

“You never have to give up liberties to be safe.”

We are into wars that are costing us trillions of dollars, those trillions should have been left in the economy to build jobs and produce prosperity here at home.”

“We were supposed to go into Iraq to get Al Qaeda, there was no Al Qaeda, we were supposed to go into Iraq to get WMDS, there were none.”

“You have to understand the mischief of the Federal Reserve.”(As crowds yelled END THE FED)

“We do not need to be bailing out the big banks and big corporations, dumping the debt on the America people, causing unemployment and causing the little guy to lose his house.”

“IT’S TIME WE RESTORE FREEDOM TO AMERICA.” ITS TIME TO BRING THE TROOPS HOME

guest
How are we at the top of the totem pole if our military is spread all over the world? Why do we have to control everything to be powerful? If you look back in history, all great empires who tried to control more and more, finally collapsed. Is it fear that makes Americans think they have the right to tell other countries what they can and cannot do? or is it just an inflated ego? I love this country and I am blessed to be here. Our military should be here protecting our borders and helping our people.

Elliottwolf
Do you really think that the U.S. should have 700 military bases all over the world (and we’re building more) in order to control foreign governments on behalf of corporate interests, while outsourcing jobs, and allowing our own country to sink? That’s not a “strong military.” That is the death of Empire.

Charlie Munger
RONPAUL 2012. REVOLUTION NOW.
END THE FEDERAL RESERVE.
Reporters are so scared to lose those fiat currency backed checks that they feel the need to spew this disinformation bs.

Guess what “US News Staff”, those checks you eventually cash are becoming weaker and weaker in regards to buying power as each QE is launched and each bankster from the institutionalized mortgage fraud walk free. As you sit there drinking your fluoride laced neurotoxin public water supply.

According to the CIA World Factbook’s ranking of trade account balances, Israel’s economy is in the top 15% at $6,269,000,000 while the United States is at the very bottom of the list with an account balance of

$-561,000,000,000. Yet despite Israel’s obvious economic health compared to the United States, Congress continues to pour YOUR FAMILY money onto Israel.

Lavon Affair = 9/11 Look it up. Learn something
Name three groups who have benefitted monetarily in the last 12 years.

Bankers. War Mongerers. Israel.

Now put them all together and you have….? Traitors.

NO MORE FOREIGN ENTANGLEMENTS.
RON PAUL 2012.

String the banksters up. No more Prescot Bush Coup!

Jay
Actually Ron Paul supports a strong military. The only difference is he supports a strong national defense, whereas neo-Cons support a strong offense. He also actually served in the military unlike almost all the other candidates! He also received more military donations than all the other GOP candidates combined!

Yet he has so many young supporters! It has nothing to do with age. McCain was a joke. He supported amnesty, he voted for the bailouts, he got a C+ from the NRA, he got an F from Gun Owners of America, he supported abortion until deciding to run for President, etc. Conservatives didn’t want to vote for him, and the Bush Administration turned people off from the Republican Party.

Or people who actually research their candidates and look at things like voting records are voting for Ron Paul, while everybody else just listens to speeches and debates where the candidates just say talking points they know you want to hear to get elected. Notice how all the candidates on that stage at the Iowa debate had to defend their positions on past issues, while Ron Paul is consistently conservative so there is no need to defend himself? WAKE UP!

SovereignHominin
WHO IS
RON PAUL?

* He has NEVER voted to raise taxes.

* He has NEVER voted for an unbalanced budget.

* He has NEVER voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.

* He has NEVER voted to raise congressional pay.

* He has NEVER taken a government-paid junket.

* He has NEVER voted to increase the power of the executive branch.

* He voted AGAINST the Patriot Act.

* He voted AGAINST regulating the Internet.

* He voted AGAINST the Iraq war.

* He DOES NOT participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.

* He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year.

Shocker83
I LOVE how he mentioned that we should stop the longest blockaid in history that we have on Cuba and begin trading again. it was a pointless blockaid and was voted to be taken down numerous times by the UN but the US and Israel said no. Ron Paul has more love for our contitution and our country in his pinky than the rest of the other candidates do, and has support from more active military than all candidates combined and has mine as well. God Bless Dr Ron Paul wether he wins or not for standing up for me and u wether u realize he is or not. RP 2012.

Keltoi
See, this is where you are wrong and/or misinformed. RP is not FOR legalizing any of these things. He is personally against these things and has stated it publicly. His position is that its not the federal governments job to tell you what you can or cannot do with your life. When did forcing one groups position on everyone else become the American way? Please learn the difference between a Democracy and a Republic. The US was set up as a Republic by our Founding Fathers. Remember? “…and to the REPUBLIC for which it stands…”

James Lancelot
All of these polls are great news despite the actual straw poll results. We all keep hearing that Ron Paul may do well in straw polls but can’t win a national election. Yet he continues to win by huge margins on many national polls. If he will destroy our military, then why has he gotten more campaign contributions from men and women serving then any other candidate, including President Obama?

Joseph Bailey

Ron Paul has had more donations from active military than all other GOP candidates combined… Ask a soldier what they think. And if you don’t like his policy go buy a gun and go over there and handle it yourself… And do it why you can cause unless Paul gets into office that liberty will soon be in the trash, wrapped in the constitution, along with all the other liberties we’ve lost…

Last but hopefully not least is what I said (sorry if we missed your comment on the thread)  maybe you could comment again on this post for us if we did!

Sandra Crosnoe

Two man [race] maybe — Paul vs Perry — age old battle of real conservative via Ron Paul vs Bush ‘conservative’ and former Gore supporter Rick Perry. But Michele Bachmann should not be discounted or discouraged. She is to be commended for standing up for the moral values that Ron Paul’s life and record reflect. It is good to have her waking up on fiscal issues and beginning to understand that we cannot spend as much as we have been for years on policing the world. Because we are broke yes; but also because it is bad policy. Freedom with personal responsibility and strong moral values is indeed the winning combination and Ron Paul is indeed the correct answer. From a Republican working to restore the Republic (a republican precinct chair and various party offices/committees over the years).

and just one last quote from Jesse Benton via yahoo

“These straw poll results, our growing poll numbers and our strong fundraising show that our message is resonating with Iowans and Americans everywhere,” campaign chairman Jesse Benton said. “Our message was the same in 2007 as it is now in 2011, but this time we have quadrupled our support. That means our message is spreading, our support is surging and people are taking notice.”

Hat tip to Mannalis Barnes for finding the gems on GretaWire for us.

Posted by Sandra Crosnoe for Finding Gems & Sharing Them.

Crossposted on OKGrassroots and Constitutional Liberty Coalition.

The Hill writes on Ron Paul’s 2nd Place in Recent NH Straw Poll

Click on pic to see original post and the rest of the article

The Hill’s Pundits Blog by Brent Budowsky goes on to say not to underestimate Ron Paul’s potential strength if he enters the presidential campaign.  Good news for the entire country to finally have more people of principle entering races across the land and talking about our founding fathers, ethics, core values, sound money, fiscal sanity and restoring the republic!  Keep praying folks~

%d bloggers like this: