Randy Brogdon Leads the Pack of Conservatives for US Senate Race in Oklahoma

As a matter of fact you might say he is the only conservative in the race for US Senate in Oklahoma.

Several weeks ago, grassroots leaders got together in Oklahoma to tell you why we are not supporting TW Shannon for US Senate. This occurred in response to some ‘national teaparty’ leaders who made a swing through the state telling us he was our man. Our letter letting them know about the error of their ways is entitled why Oklahoma Grassroots Leaders and Activists Do Not Support TW Shannon and it is here >>>

Then there are those telling us why James Lankford deserves a promotion including via his own TV ads touting his ‘conservatism’; that is until you look at his voting record which is in and of itself rather dismal. I shared with you his bad votes recently on FGST here >>>

So now it seems only fitting to let you know that there is a real conservative leader on the ballot in the primary. The media is trying to ignore him and even excluding him from some events (so what else is new right?!), but the people know that he has been there for us on so many fronts in so many battles over recent years. He’s the kind of man who is there at crunch time for you and not all focused on taking credit for all the hard work of so many people in the matter when the job is done! However you know that he was there early on and when it mattered – like for instance with the repeal of Common Core recently. Now that is a leader and one that we will not have to lobby all the time to get to do the right thing!

Document-Randy Brogdon for US Senate - 3 key issues Mon Jun 09 2014 Randy Brogdon

Stop the Debt

Repeal Obamacare

Stop NSA Spying

Document-Randy Brogdon for US Senate - Bio Mon Jun 09 2014 Randy Brogdon

Randy Brogdon’s brief bio and principles

Randy Brogdon.com

@RandyBrogdon

 

Document-Randy Brogdon for US Senate  Mon Jun 09 2014 Randy Brogdon

“Be leery of politicians that will promise you the world.  My Campaign Promise:  I will tell you the truth.  

And I will do everything in my constitutional authority to protect your freedom”

Document-Randy Brogdon for US Senate p2 Mon Jun 09 2014 Randy Brogdon

Comparison piece with startling differences between the top three candidates.  

Randy Brogdon 93%  others both in the 70 % range – barely passing!

But then of course I must also point out the differences in support for higher spending.  Lankford voted 3 times to raise the debt ceiling.  That does it for me – how about you?  Real ID anyone?  Support for Mitch McConnell?

Looks to me like the choice is clear – Randy Brogdon for US Senate.  I believe he can take it without a run-off  if only people look at the record and the money trail.  Will you help me tell the story and get out the word in your precinct?  Primary elections are about voting for the best candidate.  Run-offs will be held if necessary.  This one is a no brainer as far as I am concerned!

Here is my flyer of my favorites candidates in my area >>>

Posted by Sandra Crosnoe for Finding Gems & Sharing Them

Permalink: https://scrosnoe.wordpress.com/2014/06/09/randy-brogdon-leads-the-pack-of-conservatives-for-us-senate-race-in-oklahoma/

 

Advertisements

My Favorite Candidates for Republican Primary 2014 – Washington County Flyer

Washington County Grassroots Sample Flyer

This is a flyer I am giving to friends. It is not endorsed by any candidate so if you like it and can make some version of it work in your area, please feel free to do so.  Some candidates do not like to have their campaigns linked and I understand that, but I am only going to hand out so many flyers and to so many people, so mine are going to have my favorites of course!  Make your own version, walk the talk, make friends, and have fun along the way…

The flyer is also available on scribd for easy printing and downloading and sharing (pdf version available there).

Download * Print * Share * Adapt for your area

To plug in with the various campaigns:

Randy Barnett for HD10

Randy Brogdon for US Senator

Dax Ewbank for Governor of Oklahoma 

Posted by Sandra Crosnoe for Finding Gems & Sharing Them

Lankford Voting Record Dismal – Barely Passing by Most Standards – Send him back to Camp!

Don’t get me wrong, I personally like James Lankford.  I suspect he was a very good Christian camp director.  His politics certainly do not match mine nor I dare say any real conservative in the state of Oklahoma.  He doesn’t even get close to articulating a limited government, constitutional philosophy.  So if you were looking for another Dr. No. then I suggest you keep looking.

Let’s take a look at his bad votes over recent years and how he rates with one of the best ‘graders’ in the nation – the JBS.  I love the reports in the New American and the fact that it is online too.  You can review a complete summary of James Lankford’s votes on the Freedom Index.

us_constitution
Score Breakdown:
60% (113th Congress: 2013-2014); 70% (112th Congress: 2011-2012)
.
Let’s list only the ‘bad votes’ and see just how many of the planks of the constitution he managed to shred in his short tenure in the house (my words not those of the New American).
.
The votes below are pulled directly from the Freedom Index with a tiny summary of the vote analysis included there.  There is much more there if you want to dig deeper and compare with others too! And again this is just the ‘bad votes’ from that index for Lankford:
..

H R 2397: On Agreeing to the Amendment 54 to H R 2397

Military collaboration with the Chinese regime will not diminish the security threat it poses to the United States but, if anything, heighten it.

H R 2397: On Agreeing to the Amendment 64 to H R 2397

Authorizing the president to use military force without a declaration of war is a shifting of responsibility from Congress to the executive branch that essentially allows the president to exercise dictator-like powers and should be opposed.

H R 2397: On Agreeing to the Amendment 70 to H R 2397

Blanket collection of electronic records of citizens who are not under investigation is a violation of the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on search and seizure without a warrant.

H R 1947: Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management Act

These subsidies have resulted in large market distortions as the government essentially picks winners and losers in the food production industry, and the fact that the number of people enrolled in food stamp programs has grown consistently illustrates that these programs do little to lift people out of poverty.

H R 1960: On Agreeing to the Amendment 12 to H R 1960

Under the National Defense Authorization Act, the president may abrogate these rights simply by designating terror suspects, including Americans, as “enemy combatants.” A government that would lock up anyone indefinitely without trial is certainly moving toward tyranny, and legislation to prevent this abuse of power is needed.

H R 624: Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection (CISPA) Act

…the massive sharing of private citizens’ online data by Internet companies with federal government agencies authorized by this bill violates “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures” as set forth in the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution.

H R 933: Department of Defense, Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013

… passage of this mammoth continuing resolution provided a way for Congress to perpetuate its fiscally irresponsible, unconstitutional spending habits with a minimum of accountability to its constituents.

H R 325: To ensure the complete and timely payment of the obligations of the United States Government until May 19, 2013, and for other purposes

…the federal government should live within its means and because most of the spending responsible for the ballooning national debt is unconstitutional.

H.J.Res. 117: Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2013

…passage of this mammoth continuing resolution provided a way for Congress to perpetuate its fiscally irresponsible, unconstitutional spending habits with a minimum of accountability to its constituents.

H.R. 5949: FISA Amendments Act Reauthorization Act of 2012

…because warrantless surveillance is unconstitutional and violates privacy and individual liberty. While ostensibly carried out only on “foreign suspects” communicating with U.S. citizens, it is difficult to imagine this surveillance not extending to U.S. citizens.

H.Amdt. 1414 to H.R. 5856: An amendment to reduce appropriations made in Title IX of the bill by $20,843,869,000. The reduction shall not apply to the following accounts 1) Defense Health Program; 2) Drug Interdiction and Counter-Drug Activities, Defense; 3) Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Fund; and 4) Office of the Inspector General.

…the massive expenditure on undeclared foreign wars and nation building is unconstitutional and unaffordable.

On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass H.R. 6018: Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2013

…U.S. participation in the United Nations involves an unconstitutional delegation of our national sovereignty to the UN.

H.Amdt.1127 to H.R.4310: An amendment numbered 46 printed in House Report 112-485 to strike section 1022 of the FY2012 NDAA and amend Section 1021 of same Act to eliminate indefinite military detention of any person detained under AUMF authority in U.S., territories or possessions by providing immediate transfer to trial and proceedings by a court established under Article III of the Constitution of the United states or by an appropriate State court.

…the War on Terror must not be allowed to destroy constitutional legal protections, including the issuance of a warrant based on probable cause (Fourth Amendment) and the right to a trial (Sixth Amendment).

H.R. 3523: Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA)

…the CISPA bill would permit government access to the private information of citizens, in violation of the Fourth Amendment “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.”

H.R. 3521: Expedited Legislative Line-Item Veto and Rescissions Act of 2012

…providing any form of line-item veto power to the President violates the Constitution’s separation of powers.

H.R. 2055: Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012

…many of the bill’s spending programs — e.g., education, housing, foreign aid, etc. — are unconstitutional. Moreover, passing this mammoth appropriations bill in light of the ongoing trillion-dollar annual deficits is grossly fiscally irresponsible. Furthermore, packaging the appropriations bills for so many large federal agencies into one mega-bill greatly reduces the accountability of the Congressmen to their constituents.

H.R. 3080: United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act

…agreements such as this one are intended to transfer trade (and other) powers to super-national arrangements binding the United States, despite the fact that under the Constitution only Congress has the power “to regulate commerce with foreign nations.”

S. 365: Budget Control Act of 2011

…the debt deal allows both the national debt and spending to continue their upward trajectories. Moreover, the budget process established by the legislation is clearly unconstitutional since no Congress can bind the actions of future Congresses via the so-called automatic cuts.

H.Con.Res. 51: Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove the United States Armed Forces from Libya

…not merely because Obama’s Libya deployment is now in violation of the War Powers Act’s 60-day requirement for congressional authorization, but also because it violates the Constitution, which clearly assigns to Congress the power “to declare war.”

S. 990: PATRIOT Sunsets Extension Act of 2011

…because the provisions that were extended, as well as the Patriot Act as a whole, violate the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution.

Now lest you are thinking well, that is just the JBS.  They are a little right wing.  Here’s what the Senate Conservative Fund says – oh and the Senate is no bastion of real conservative thought either as you well know.

Oklahoma Representative James Lankford will announce his intentions later Monday afternoon for Senator Tom Coburn’s seat in the U.S. Senate. He’s expected to seek the election but he won’t have a key group supporting him.

The Senate Conservatives Fund (SCF) says Lankford’s voting history will prevent support from them.

“We won’t support Congressman Lankford’s bid for the Senate because of his past votes to increase the debt limit, raise taxes, and fund Obamacare,” said SCF Executive Director Matt Hoskins. “We have reviewed his record and it’s clear that conservatives cannot count on him to fight for their principles.”

The SCF sites a number of Lankford’s voting history that includes raising the debt limit, funding Obamacare, and supporting the Ryan-Murray budget agreement. (article reference here)

So are you beginning to understand why James Lankford should not be promoted?  In fact he should be sent home with a copy of the constitution to read and study a lot more diligently if he ever wants to run for any office in the land in this author’s opinion.  Rhetoric always sounds appealing in campaign season and TV ads always look good, but the proof is in the track record of the actual recorded votes.  There it is folks.  He did it to himself.  Time to send James Lankford back to camp.

Posted by Sandra Crosnoe for Finding Gems & Sharing Them

Permalink: https://scrosnoe.wordpress.com/2014/05/22/lankford-voting-record-dismal

Sample Ballot for Washington County Republican Primary Election 2014 set for June 24th

Sample Ballot for District 10 June 24th

And now the question is – Do You Know these People?

Washington County is partly in House District 10 and partly in District 11.  This particular ballot is for District 11.  If you are in District 10 you need to be aware of the open seat being vacated by Steve Martin for which Randy Barnett is running.

To plug in with my favorite campaigns:

Randy Barnett for HD10

Randy Brogdon for US Senator

Dax Ewbank for Governor of Oklahoma 

Now this is a flyer I am playing with and it is not endorsed by any candidate so if you like it and can make some version of it work in your area, please feel free to do so.  Candidates do not like to have their campaigns linked and I understand that, but I am only going to hand out so many flyers and to so many people, so mine are going to have my favorites OK?!  Make your own with your favorites, walk the talk, make friends, and having fun along the way….

Download * Print * Share * Adapt for your area

Posted by Sandra Crosnoe for Finding Gems & Sharing Them

Republican Primary Election is June 24th – Do You Know Who is on the Ballot?

Sample Ballot for District 10 June 24th

And now the question is – Do You Know these People?

Washington County is partly in House District 10 and partly in District 11.  This particular ballot is for District 11.  If you are in District 10 you need to be aware of the open seat being vacated by Steve Martin for which Randy Barnett is running.  He will be one of the featured speakers at Sooner Park this weekend.  (h/t Joy Molina Collins for the sample ballot photo and so much more!)

Some of the brightest and the best will be speaking here in Bartlesville this weekend.

Rock the Vote - Sooner Park

Sooner Park *

May 18th 2-5PM

Featured Artists:

New Kings

Eric Aubrey

KSON

Featured Speakers:

Randy Brogdon

Dax Ewbank

Randy Barnett

Rock the Vote – B’Ville 2014

This should be a lot of fun and a great family event too! Mark your calendar for Sunday afternoon May 18th at Sooner Park with music and candidates too! ‪#‎R3s‬ ‪#‎4life‬ ‪#‎4liberty‬ #FreeEvent #DonationsAppreciated

Sponsored By: Bartians For Academic Freedom, Washington County Prayer Team, The Capital Meeting, OK Grassroots, R3publicans, Washington County Republicans – OK Grassroots, Liberty on Tap, Tulsa 9.12, Day of Resistance – Tulsa Area, OKforTEA

* Sooner Park is located on South corner of Madison & Tuxedo — just 1 mile East of Hwy 75 in Bartlesville Oklahoma.

To plug in with the various campaigns:

Randy Barnett for HD10

Randy Brogdon for US Senator

Dax Ewbank for Governor of Oklahoma 

Now this is a flyer I am playing with and it is not endorsed by any candidate so if you like it and can make some version of it work in your area, please feel free to do so.  Candidates do not like to have their campaigns linked and I understand that, but I am only going to hand out so many flyers and to so many people, so mine are going to have my favorites OK?!  Make your own, walk the talk, make friends, and have fun along the way….

Download * Print * Share * Adapt for your area

Posted by Sandra Crosnoe for Finding Gems & Sharing Them

Congratulations Oklahoma Winners — Actions will Validate Campaign Promises — Oklahoma General Election Results 2012

Oklahoma Election Results 2012 Summary version:

Romney wins Oklahoma but Obama is reelected President of the United States in a very close election.

Bridenstine wins Oklahoma CD01 Congressional Seat replacing Sullivan (who he beat in the primary election).

Oklahoma passes all six state questions and retains all judges listed on the ballot.

Here are the more detailed Oklahoma election results:

http://www.ok.gov/elections/support/ok_results_seb.html (for latest results)

Results as of: 11/7/2012 5:42:44 AM
Line
PRESIDENT
FOR PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
BARACK OBAMA (DEM) 19,328 43,121 380,338 442,787 33.2%
MITT ROMNEY (REP) 44,617 68,596 776,497 889,710 66.8%
Total 63,945 111,717 1,156,835 1,332,497
Line
UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE
FOR UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 01
327 of 327 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
JOHN OLSON (DEM) 4,118 6,287 80,905 91,310 32.0%
JIM BRIDENSTINE (REP) 8,980 7,541 164,365 180,886 63.5%
CRAIG ALLEN (IND) 510 451 11,825 12,786 4.5%
Total 13,608 14,279 257,095 284,982
FOR UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 02
530 of 530 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
ROB WALLACE (DEM) 2,995 10,983 81,953 95,931 38.3%
MARKWAYNE MULLIN (REP) 5,672 16,836 121,009 143,517 57.3%
MICHAEL G. FULKS (IND) 400 1,045 9,364 10,809 4.3%
Total 9,067 28,864 212,326 250,257
FOR UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 03
481 of 481 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
TIMOTHY RAY MURRAY (DEM) 2,308 6,251 44,736 53,295 20.0%
FRANK D. LUCAS (REP) 8,921 21,954 170,088 200,963 75.3%
WILLIAM M. SANDERS (IND) 524 1,135 11,087 12,746 4.8%
Total 11,753 29,340 225,911 267,004
FOR UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 04
350 of 350 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
DONNA MARIE BEBO (DEM) 3,370 7,814 60,571 71,755 27.6%
TOM COLE (REP) 8,728 13,999 153,834 176,561 67.9%
RJ HARRIS (IND) 531 732 10,462 11,725 4.5%
Total 12,629 22,545 224,867 260,041
FOR UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 05
273 of 273 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
TOM GUILD (DEM) 4,598 9,577 83,184 97,359 37.3%
JAMES LANKFORD (REP) 10,737 6,117 136,567 153,421 58.7%
PAT MARTIN (IND) 195 213 4,972 5,380 2.1%
ROBERT T. MURPHY (IND) 223 182 4,757 5,162 2.0%
Total 15,753 16,089 229,480 261,322
Line
STATE SENATOR
FOR STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 3
47 of 47 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
JIM BYNUM (DEM) 593 932 9,737 11,262 45.7%
WAYNE SHAW (REP) 697 1,131 11,555 13,383 54.3%
Total 1,290 2,063 21,292 24,645
FOR STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 5
85 of 85 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
JERRY ELLIS (DEM) 389 1,418 14,111 15,918 66.5%
HOWARD HOUCHEN (REP) 330 953 6,724 8,007 33.5%
Total 719 2,371 20,835 23,925
FOR STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 7
76 of 76 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
J. PAUL LANE (DEM) 442 1,208 10,490 12,140 46.2%
LARRY BOGGS (REP) 559 1,353 12,248 14,160 53.8%
Total 1,001 2,561 22,738 26,300
FOR STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 9
32 of 32 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
EARL GARRISON (DEM) 486 3,172 13,518 17,176 69.7%
BARNEY S TAYLOR (REP) 301 1,313 5,855 7,469 30.3%
Total 787 4,485 19,373 24,645
FOR STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 11
36 of 36 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
JABAR SHUMATE (DEM) 740 1,881 12,573 15,194 76.0%
DAVE BELL (REP) 183 168 3,056 3,407 17.0%
CURTIS J. MULLINS (IND) 39 78 1,284 1,401 7.0%
Total 962 2,127 16,913 20,002
FOR STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 13
51 of 51 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
SUSAN PADDACK (DEM) 600 2,419 16,789 19,808 75.9%
FRED E SMITH (REP) 288 755 5,263 6,306 24.1%
Total 888 3,174 22,052 26,114
FOR STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 15
31 of 31 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
CLAUDIA GRIFFITH (DEM) 623 1,149 9,950 11,722 38.4%
ROB STANDRIDGE (REP) 1,128 1,135 16,503 18,766 61.6%
Total 1,751 2,284 26,453 30,488
FOR STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 27
77 of 77 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
A. BRYCE MARLATT (REP) 1,126 3,254 18,808 23,188 84.5%
TOMMY W. NICHOLSON (IND) 201 589 3,470 4,260 15.5%
Total 1,327 3,843 22,278 27,448
FOR STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 31
53 of 53 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
TONY TERRILL (DEM) 274 1,073 6,156 7,503 32.2%
DON BARRINGTON (REP) 607 1,842 13,348 15,797 67.8%
Total 881 2,915 19,504 23,300
FOR STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 39
39 of 39 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
JULIE HALL (DEM) 787 628 12,960 14,375 43.1%
BRIAN A. CRAIN (REP) 1,166 599 17,228 18,993 56.9%
Total 1,953 1,227 30,188 33,368
FOR STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 41
29 of 29 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
CLARK JOLLEY (REP) 2,295 1,026 24,059 27,380 79.4%
RICHARD PRAWDZIENSKI (IND) 437 404 6,262 7,103 20.6%
Total 2,732 1,430 30,321 34,483
FOR STATE SENATOR DISTRICT 43
54 of 54 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
MIKE FULLERTON (DEM) 311 682 7,721 8,714 29.3%
COREY BROOKS (REP) 942 1,683 18,384 21,009 70.7%
Total 1,253 2,365 26,105 29,723
Line
STATE REPRESENTATIVE
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 2
21 of 21 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
RICK AGENT (DEM) 178 650 4,608 5,436 46.3%
JOHN R. BENNETT (REP) 217 790 5,307 6,314 53.7%
Total 395 1,440 9,915 11,750
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 3
21 of 21 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
JAMES H LOCKHART (DEM) 210 756 6,045 7,011 59.8%
ROGER MATTOX (REP) 161 673 3,883 4,717 40.2%
Total 371 1,429 9,928 11,728
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 12
18 of 18 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
WADE ROUSSELOT (DEM) 203 799 6,323 7,325 53.9%
DAVID TACKETT (REP) 268 564 5,424 6,256 46.1%
Total 471 1,363 11,747 13,581
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 14
15 of 15 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
JERRY RAINS (DEM) 183 789 4,690 5,662 45.1%
ARTHUR HULBERT (REP) 271 993 5,616 6,880 54.9%
Total 454 1,782 10,306 12,542
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 16
29 of 29 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
JERRY SHOEMAKE (DEM) 187 687 6,656 7,530 61.0%
JAMES DELSO (REP) 202 339 4,277 4,818 39.0%
Total 389 1,026 10,933 12,348
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 20
22 of 22 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
MATT BRANSTETTER (DEM) 176 278 3,815 4,269 33.5%
BOBBY CLEVELAND (REP) 452 538 7,471 8,461 66.5%
Total 628 816 11,286 12,730
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 21
17 of 17 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
JERRY L. TOMLINSON (DEM) 98 453 3,564 4,115 36.0%
DUSTIN ROBERTS (REP) 190 885 6,232 7,307 64.0%
Total 288 1,338 9,796 11,422
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 22
32 of 32 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
DORIS ANNE ROW (DEM) 198 900 5,391 6,489 49.1%
CHARLES A McCALL (REP) 230 1,031 5,460 6,721 50.9%
Total 428 1,931 10,851 13,210
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 23
14 of 14 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
SHAWNA KELLER (DEM) 123 197 4,080 4,400 41.5%
TERRY O’DONNELL (REP) 227 239 5,730 6,196 58.5%
Total 350 436 9,810 10,596
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 26
13 of 13 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
PATTY SUE WAGSTAFF (DEM) 210 693 3,944 4,847 39.4%
JUSTIN FREELAND WOOD (REP) 284 1,027 6,144 7,455 60.6%
Total 494 1,720 10,088 12,302
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 27
17 of 17 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
RANDY R GILBERT (DEM) 172 320 4,466 4,958 38.1%
JOSH COCKROFT (REP) 400 544 7,117 8,061 61.9%
Total 572 864 11,583 13,019
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 28
17 of 17 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
MARILYN RAINWATER (DEM) 107 381 3,711 4,199 37.2%
TOM NEWELL (REP) 280 535 6,275 7,090 62.8%
Total 387 916 9,986 11,289
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 29
21 of 21 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
DAVID W NARCOMEY (DEM) 101 294 2,826 3,221 23.6%
SKYE McNIEL (REP) 298 860 9,242 10,400 76.4%
Total 399 1,154 12,068 13,621
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 32
23 of 23 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
KEITH KINNAMON (DEM) 183 556 5,115 5,854 42.8%
JASON SMALLEY (REP) 277 693 6,844 7,814 57.2%
Total 460 1,249 11,959 13,668
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 36
20 of 20 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
JIM MASSEY (DEM) 217 160 4,425 4,802 34.6%
SEAN ROBERTS (REP) 435 240 8,399 9,074 65.4%
Total 652 400 12,824 13,876
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 37
23 of 23 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
NANCY L. NIEMANN (DEM) 211 356 4,756 5,323 40.9%
STEVEN E. VAUGHAN (REP) 417 605 6,685 7,707 59.1%
Total 628 961 11,441 13,030
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 42
24 of 24 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
STEVEN VINES (DEM) 123 282 2,308 2,713 20.2%
LISA J. BILLY (REP) 417 1,140 9,146 10,703 79.8%
Total 540 1,422 11,454 13,416
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 45
11 of 11 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
PAULA ROBERTS (DEM) 348 755 5,665 6,768 49.9%
AARON STILES (REP) 389 553 5,844 6,786 50.1%
Total 737 1,308 11,509 13,554
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 47
14 of 14 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
LEON A PIVINSKI (DEM) 178 252 2,725 3,155 20.4%
LESLIE KATHRYN OSBORN (REP) 808 898 10,604 12,310 79.6%
Total 986 1,150 13,329 15,465
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 48
20 of 20 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
BRIAN SPENCER (DEM) 153 413 3,059 3,625 28.0%
PATRICK OWNBEY (REP) 368 1,033 7,904 9,305 72.0%
Total 521 1,446 10,963 12,930
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 51
23 of 23 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
STEWART MEYER (DEM) 174 382 4,559 5,115 35.7%
SCOTT R. BIGGS (REP) 436 670 8,119 9,225 64.3%
Total 610 1,052 12,678 14,340
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 56
29 of 29 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
DAVID L PERRYMAN (DEM) 211 766 5,110 6,087 50.5%
CHUCK UTSLER (REP) 243 656 5,059 5,958 49.5%
Total 454 1,422 10,169 12,045
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 60
19 of 19 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
KENDRA MENZ-KIMBLE (DEM) 168 450 4,095 4,713 37.7%
DAN FISHER (REP) 345 677 6,763 7,785 62.3%
Total 513 1,127 10,858 12,498
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 66
17 of 17 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
DAVID C. PHILLIPS, III (DEM) 186 222 3,975 4,383 33.2%
JADINE NOLLAN (REP) 331 259 8,246 8,836 66.8%
Total 517 481 12,221 13,219
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 71
16 of 16 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
DAN ARTHRELL (DEM) 367 409 5,685 6,461 46.8%
KATIE HENKE (REP) 492 302 6,563 7,357 53.2%
Total 859 711 12,248 13,818
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 72
19 of 19 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
SENECA SCOTT (DEM) 181 455 5,350 5,986 72.7%
RANDALL L. REESE (REP) 78 80 2,087 2,245 27.3%
Total 259 535 7,437 8,231
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 76
13 of 13 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
GLENDA K. PUETT (DEM) 177 218 4,700 5,095 32.3%
DAVID BRUMBAUGH (REP) 551 235 9,880 10,666 67.7%
Total 728 453 14,580 15,761
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 78
21 of 21 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
JEANNIE McDANIEL (DEM) 422 394 7,988 8,804 61.4%
PAUL CATALANO (REP) 226 167 5,134 5,527 38.6%
Total 648 561 13,122 14,331
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 83
18 of 18 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
ED HOLZBERGER (DEM) 360 661 4,876 5,897 34.9%
RANDY McDANIEL (REP) 1,085 409 9,491 10,985 65.1%
Total 1,445 1,070 14,367 16,882
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 86
25 of 25 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
WILL FOURKILLER (DEM) 440 566 6,322 7,328 68.7%
RUSSELL DON TURNER (REP) 180 268 2,890 3,338 31.3%
Total 620 834 9,212 10,666
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 87
13 of 13 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
NICK SINGER (DEM) 243 357 5,082 5,682 44.6%
JASON NELSON (REP) 461 174 6,413 7,048 55.4%
Total 704 531 11,495 12,730
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 88
13 of 13 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
KAY FLOYD (DEM) 266 419 6,774 7,459 69.2%
AARON KASPEREIT (REP) 181 112 3,032 3,325 30.8%
Total 447 531 9,806 10,784
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 99
16 of 16 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
ANASTASIA A. PITTMAN (DEM) 408 1,841 8,379 10,628 83.5%
WILLARD LINZY (REP) 123 157 1,819 2,099 16.5%
Total 531 1,998 10,198 12,727
FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE DISTRICT 101
19 of 19 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
STEPHEN E COVERT (DEM) 242 287 4,586 5,115 32.4%
GARY BANZ (REP) 575 181 9,908 10,664 67.6%
Total 817 468 14,494 15,779
Line
JUDICIAL RETENTION
SUPREME COURT – NOMA D. GURICH
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
YES 33,377 65,638 689,311 788,326 66.5%
NO 17,255 33,167 347,457 397,879 33.5%
Total 50,632 98,805 1,036,768 1,186,205
SUPREME COURT – YVONNE KAUGER
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
YES 32,610 64,499 676,471 773,580 65.6%
NO 17,880 33,639 353,262 404,781 34.4%
Total 50,490 98,138 1,029,733 1,178,361
SUPREME COURT – JAMES E. EDMONDSON
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
YES 33,166 65,843 691,763 790,772 66.9%
NO 17,485 32,677 341,080 391,242 33.1%
Total 50,651 98,520 1,032,843 1,182,014
SUPREME COURT – DOUGLAS L. COMBS
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
YES 32,770 65,101 684,656 782,527 66.4%
NO 17,424 33,149 345,280 395,853 33.6%
Total 50,194 98,250 1,029,936 1,178,380
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS – CLANCY SMITH
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
YES 32,591 63,777 674,548 770,916 65.8%
NO 17,268 33,882 349,323 400,473 34.2%
Total 49,859 97,659 1,023,871 1,171,389
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS – ARLENE JOHNSON
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
YES 32,822 65,084 680,298 778,204 66.6%
NO 17,036 32,473 341,290 390,799 33.4%
Total 49,858 97,557 1,021,588 1,169,003
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS – DAVID B. LEWIS
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
YES 32,973 64,784 684,056 781,813 67.0%
NO 16,741 32,577 335,978 385,296 33.0%
Total 49,714 97,361 1,020,034 1,167,109
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS – P. THOMAS THORNBRUGH
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
YES 33,353 64,193 687,579 785,125 67.3%
NO 16,398 33,030 331,764 381,192 32.7%
Total 49,751 97,223 1,019,343 1,166,317
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS – WILLIAM C. HETHERINGTON, JR.
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
YES 32,377 63,358 666,257 761,992 65.6%
NO 17,186 33,485 348,188 398,859 34.4%
Total 49,563 96,843 1,014,445 1,160,851
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS – KENNETH L. BUETTNER
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
YES 33,067 63,719 683,415 780,201 67.3%
NO 16,424 32,978 330,189 379,591 32.7%
Total 49,491 96,697 1,013,604 1,159,792
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS – ROBERT BOBBY BELL
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
YES 32,328 63,249 669,133 764,710 65.9%
NO 17,193 33,479 344,648 395,320 34.1%
Total 49,521 96,728 1,013,781 1,160,030
COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS – E. BAY MITCHELL, III
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
YES 32,904 63,906 679,451 776,261 66.9%
NO 16,607 32,903 334,726 384,236 33.1%
Total 49,511 96,809 1,014,177 1,160,497
Line
STATE QUESTIONS
STATE QUESTION NO. 758 LEGISLATIVE REFERENDUM NO. 358
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
FOR THE PROPOSAL – YES 42,807 68,814 745,090 856,711 67.7%
AGAINST THE PROPOSAL – NO 14,445 37,287 356,593 408,325 32.3%
Total 57,252 106,101 1,101,683 1,265,036
STATE QUESTION NO. 759 LEGISLATIVE REFERENDUM NO. 359
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
FOR THE PROPOSAL – YES 34,174 57,866 652,514 744,554 59.2%
AGAINST THE PROPOSAL – NO 22,885 47,656 442,705 513,246 40.8%
Total 57,059 105,522 1,095,219 1,257,800
STATE QUESTION NO. 762 LEGISLATIVE REFERENDUM NO. 360
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
FOR THE PROPOSAL – YES 33,876 62,376 647,613 743,865 59.2%
AGAINST THE PROPOSAL – NO 23,092 43,015 447,027 513,134 40.8%
Total 56,968 105,391 1,094,640 1,256,999
STATE QUESTION NO. 764 LEGISLATIVE REFERENDUM NO. 361
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
FOR THE PROPOSAL – YES 32,167 58,738 614,131 705,036 56.7%
AGAINST THE PROPOSAL – NO 24,006 45,555 469,047 538,608 43.3%
Total 56,173 104,293 1,083,178 1,243,644
STATE QUESTION NO. 765 LEGISLATIVE REFERENDUM NO. 362
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
FOR THE PROPOSAL – YES 34,595 58,889 657,074 750,558 59.9%
AGAINST THE PROPOSAL – NO 21,974 46,184 433,932 502,090 40.1%
Total 56,569 105,073 1,091,006 1,252,648
STATE QUESTION NO. 766 LEGISLATIVE REFERENDUM NO. 363
1960 of 1960 Precincts Completely Reporting
ABSENTEE
MAIL
EARLY
VOTING
ELECTION
DAY
TOTAL
FOR THE PROPOSAL – YES 38,321 65,374 721,047 824,742 65.0%
AGAINST THE PROPOSAL – NO 18,923 41,058 384,656 444,637 35.0%
Total 57,244 106,432 1,105,703 1,269,379
Results as of: 11/7/2012 5:42:44 AM

Keep your promises made on the campaign trail and your oath of office too.

Keep a copy of the State and Federal Constitution handy for reference (before you vote)!

Follow peace with all men, and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord:
Hebrews 12:13-15

Posted by Sandra Crosnoe for Finding Gems & Sharing Them

OKGrassroots

Posted in Activism, Conservatives, Elections, Grassroots, History, OKGrassroots, Politics, R3publicans, Teaparty. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Leave a Comment »
%d bloggers like this: